@Article{GonzálezGonMenDomRos:2014:NoFlAn,
author = "Gonz{\'a}lez, Arian Ojeda and Gonzalez, Walter Dem{\'e}trio and
Mendes, Odim and Domingues, Margarete Oliveira and Rosa, Reinaldo
Roberto",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais
(INPE)}",
title = "Nonlinear fluctuation analysis for a set of 41 magnetic clouds
measured by the Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) spacecraft",
journal = "Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics",
year = "2014",
volume = "21",
number = "5",
pages = "1059--1073",
abstract = "The statistical distribution of values in the signal and the
autocorrelations (interpreted as the memory or persistence)
between values are attributes of a time series. The
autocorrelation function values are positive in a time series with
persistence, while they are negative in a time series with
anti-persistence. The persistence of values with respect to each
other can be strong, weak, or nonexistent. A strong correlation
implies a {"} memory{"} of previous values in the time series. The
long-range persistence in time series could be studied using
semivariograms, rescaled range, detrended fluctuation analysis and
Fourier spectral analysis, respectively. In this work, persistence
analysis is to study interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) time
series.We use data from the IMF components with a time resolution
of 16 s. Time intervals corresponding to distinct processes around
41 magnetic clouds (MCs) in the period between March 1998 and
December 2003 were selected. In this exploratory study, the
purpose of this selection is to deal with the cases presenting the
three periods: plasma sheath, MC, and post-MC. We calculated one
exponent of persistence (e.g., ±, ², Hu, Ha) over the previous
three time intervals. The persistence exponent values increased
inside cloud regions, and it was possible to select the following
threshold values:(±(j )i = 1.392, hHa(j )i = 0.327, and hHu(j
)i=0.875. These values are useful as another test to evaluate the
quality of the identification. If the cloud is well structured,
then the persistence exponent values exceed thresholds. In 80.5%
of the cases studied, these tools were able to separate the region
of the cloud from neighboring regions. The Hausdorff exponent (Ha)
provides the best results.",
doi = "10.5194/npg-21-1059-2014",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/npg-21-1059-2014",
issn = "1023-5809",
label = "scopus 2014-11 OjedaGonz{\'a}lezGonMenDomRos:2014:NoFlAn",
language = "en",
urlaccessdate = "28 abr. 2024"
}